Skip to main content

Thorough, blunt, and brutal.

I hadn't even heard of this "porn storm" attack on facebook, but frankly it's kinda hilarious. See, I've more than a bit of troll in me. I think I have too much of a conscience, though, to ever actually troll anyone terribly well. As a result I never went much for 4chan itself and its boards but have enjoyed (back when it was still vile and brilliant and funny as fuck). But though not much of a troll-er myself, I can still appreciate a good trolling.

And, frankly, plastering porn and gore across facebook is classic. And hilarious.

However, this dipshit thinks it definitely/probably wasn't Anonymous. Fair enough--it's hard to pin it on anyone for certain--but he thinks it couldn't be them for all the wrong reasons. And it leaves me wondering how it can be so difficult for people to understand Anonymous and /b/ and all that.
For those familiar with them, I may have to break rules 1 and 2 for this, but I hope you can forgive me.

Firstly, Anonymous isn't (simply) some group of 1337 hax0rz (that's 'elite hackers' for those who, as the analyst sourced in the article above clearly is, are unfamiliar with teh Intarwebz). Sure, there are plenty of hackers and crackers and code monkeys and so forth that frequent /b/; no doubt about it. And I wouldn't be surprised if, for whatever reasons--for some sense of anarchy, belonging, or homage--, some groups even use "Anonymous" as a rallying cry and calling card.

But that isn't what Anonymous "is". That's not even what the name means or anything like that; in fact, it doesn't mean anything. The only significance it has, fundamentally, is that on /b/ you can put in your name when you make a post to a thread or start one, but almost no one ever does and you simply do not have to. As a result, 99% of the posts are attributed to simply "Anonymous" because the poster literally remained anonymous.

Secondly, 4chan, /b/, and all that are not some gathering place for evildoing hackers with creepy fetishes. The majority of the posters, likely, aren't even hackers--but what are collectively called "/b/-tards".

So rather than some hacker training ground/haunt, it's more a place of cockpics or titshots and myrthful shadenfreude; for the most part, it's just a foul cauldron of internet memes and image macros. With the anonymity comes a liberation of one's cynicism, dark humor, extreme political incorrectness, and meaningless jabbing.

On Saturdays, for example, you will find countless adorable .gifs and pics of kitties because Saturday on /b/ is really Caturday. On any given day, you're likely to find green text stories--often, but not exclusively, personal-ish "accounts" by /b/tards of losing their virginity or whatever the OP (original poster) declares the theme; these stories usually begin "be ___", as in "be 14 and virgin", and have ended as nonsensically as "then urvryone walked like a dinosaur".

Other threads might be "woman logic" detailing and even misogynistically making fun of how irrational women can be. Others could be image macros as basic as (de)motivational posters.

The content on /b/ can be offensive, it can be cute, it can be hilarious; any and all of that is fair game on /b/. The anonymity removes consequence, and thus my generation's boredom and discontent--even malcontent--can be unleashed to whatever ends of funhazzing and meanness.

Thirdly, Anonymous isn't a coordinated group of anything, certainly not necessarily faceless computer pirates; there may be many such people posting to 4chan's boards, and many of whom may even work together in some raids, but that's only part of the overall "group".

If Anonymous is anything, it is definitely not coordinated. The only arguably unifying thing is: doing it for the lulz. It is not sophisticated, it is not coordinated, it isn't even a group. It's a collection of groups and peoples of myriad backgrounds, interests, and intents who, at best/most, share in finding joy and pleasure in shit--semiliterally, shit. Yes, often enough, it's the misfortune of others. And yes, as such, some even find joy in inflicting misfortune. But that's not necessarily Anonymous.

Fourthly, yeah, there are raids. They can be hilarious for /b/tards and obnoxious for the trolled victims.

Basically, /b/tards and others may gather from time to time and "invade" someplace and, say, post lotsa gore and porn on that site. Alternatively they may just inflict frustration and memes, as in the case of Habbo raids or in isolated posts/threads on such frequently derided places as wikifur. Such /b/tards may even declare victory or some such on behalf of Anonymous and /b/, though not actually representing either.

Much more often than not, raids are done for the lulz and not--even indifferent to--any actual harms inflicted.

So, when this George Petre, senior analyst at bitdefender, says shit like "These are ordinary scams and we believe Anonymous would use something more sophisticated," he's clearly full of shit and ig'nant. Sophisticated? I just got through saying Anonymous isn't sophisticated. It can be thorough. It can be blunt. It can be brutal. But it isn't necessarily or by definition sophisticated.

If it weren't so likely that he really doesn't understand a thing about anonymous, I'd say he's probably a troll--in this case feeding dysinformation to the reporter for the lulz. Totally possible with /b/tards. However, there's such pervasive misunderstanding about Anonymous among (I hate to say it) older generations--likely precisely because of trolls & /b/tards and a lack of internet fluency--that it's probably this George guy is as oblivious as Fox News was when it called Anonymous "hackers on steroids":

I love this video. It's such a good example of how misunderstood--and gleefully so, for /b/tards--Anonymous is. For example, note the hacker adding commentary--"who wants us to hide his identity", ergo remain anonymous--is almost certainly trolling Fox News. This shit is hilarious; everyone all up in a tizzy over some bullshit. 

(Also--"secret website"!? Um, 4chan is quite easily found--simply go to Tada! So secret.)

Anyway; this so called porn storm on facebook is classic. Thorough, blunt, and brutal. Although capable of crafting some well-honed worm thing, "Anonymous" doesn't need to and certainly can't be ruled out because the attack was "too simple". Sometimes those are the best kinds of trolls--the idiotically simple.


Other things that might interest you...

This moment: A tattoo.

So I read Mrs. Dalloway in high school, and it was perhaps the most beautiful thing I'd ever read. One passage in particular, very early in the book, hit me hard with my first experience of the sublime, and stayed with me—and led at last to my first tattoo.
In people’s eyes, in the swing, tramp, and trudge; in the bellow and the uproar; the carriages, motor cars, omnibuses, vans, sandwich men shuffling and swinging; brass bands; barrel organs; in the triumph and the jingle and the strange high singing of some aeroplane overhead was what she loved; life; London; this moment of June.  (Emphasis added; full paragraph included below. From the full text of the novel as made available by the University of Adelaide.)

The paragraph this is from, the 4th paragraph of the novel, is the 1st passage with the stream of consciousness the book is famous for; although self-limited here, the flow is no less gorgeous. In the passage, Clarissa is walking on a street to get those famous flowers herse…

Losing Doolittle.

I recently got to spend a few days at the lake house my family used to visit through most of my childhood; we no longer own it, and it turns out I missed it more deeply than I realized.

Anthony and I both got the week before NYC Pride off this year, so I contrived to get us a little time there. The cousins who own Greenshore gave Anthony and me permission to relax there for several days rather than just the 1 or 2 I had expected. Good god, I'm grateful for that.

I missed this place. Standing on the balcony, the porch, or the dock and looking out over the lake, I was reminded of the beauty and tranquility this lake represents for me. The meaning and memories, too.

This was always a place of solace and stability for me. We moved around a lot when I was a kid, but we always came back to this place. It had been in our family for generations before I was even born—if we'd been able to keep it, it would have been a solid 4 generations including mine. This was where I figured out I w…

Sarracenia 'Palmerpink.'

So I posted the other day about my rekindled carnivorous plant obsession—I mean, hobby. I mentioned, in passing, that I had "discovered" a possible cultivar, so here's the lowdown on what that means and what I meant.

The term "cultivar" is short for "cultivated variety," and signifies that a particular plant is so desirable and interesting that people want exact copies of it rather than simply seed from it. Some famous American pitcher plant (Sarracenia) cultivars include the legendary Adrian Slack, the massive Leah Wilkerson, and the classic Judith Hindle.

Part of how these come about is that, unlike horses x donkeys = mules and certain other hybrids, Sarracenia hybrids aren't sterile and can be crossed and recrossed without limit. Further, random chance can create crazy combinations of genes such that even hybrids between the same species—heck, even the same parents—can demonstrate quite the variety. More on that elsewhere.

Depending on how easy…